The British government is
taking an interest in the Carbon Offset game. The House of Commons environmental audit committee is to launch an
inquiry next month. Tim Yeo, Conservative chairman of the all-party committee,
explains: "The difficulty about this is it is completely unregulated and
therefore there may be some dubious practices we don't know of... The second
problem is establishing that what you are doing wouldn't have happened
anyway." The inquiry will consider whether there should be a compulsory
accreditation scheme for carbon offset projects, and whether there is enough good
information around to enable consumers to choose. Mmm, tricky: who do you think
they’re going to ask?
Meanwhile, The Department for Environment Food and Rural
Affairs, DEFRA, not always known for taking an angle that bears any
relationship to the rest of government or EU policy, has named four offsets
companies that meet its own new criteria to bring "greater clarity"
to the industry – Pure, Global Cool, Equiclimate and Carbon Offsets.
Trouble is, these are companies
dealing in industrial-type Certified Emission Reductions (CERs), not the
Verified Emission Reductions (VERs) that we’re used to, clean energy projects
in developing countries, etc. "CERs are designed to be used by countries
to meet their Kyoto reduction targets. So in leveraging business to offer
CERs to the public, the worst case scenario is that this is just a back door
way of Government being able to get more money out of the consumer purse – for
a job they should be doing themselves.” So says Lawrence Hunt, CEO of Silverjet, a new business-class airline
which claims to be the world's first to go completely carbon neutral by
including a mandatory offset contribution in its ticket prices (a scheme
developed with the CarbonNeutral Company,
see article in the next Bello Mundo). While this is not in fact the case - Nature Air, one of Costa Rica's domestic
airlines, has been operating a zero emissions flying programme since January
2006 – Hunt is to be congratulated for calling on all airlines to be carbon
neutral. "If the industry was to simply charge its customers 90p for each
hour they fly on average, then they could neutralise the carbon pollution
created by the aviation industry," he said. Nice idea, shame it’s not true;
but do carry on, we need the issue to stay in the news. Ah, that reminds me,
CERs are twice as expensive as VERs, that must count in their favour, surely...
Conflicting advice from the government? Whatever next? You might find friendlier information about the offsets market at www.cdmgoldstandard.org, or even, maybe, at www.ticos.co.uk, (Tourism Industry Carbon Offset Scheme), the travel industry's own source. You’ll get an even better perspective if you take the time to look at www.carbontradewatch.org and www.sinkswatch.org .
I hadn’t heard it
before, but I now gather that the much trumpeted (now, if only...) Coldplay carbon neutral album was
clobbered when most of the trees died on the mango plantation in India they sponsored.
Note also (carbontradewatch and sinkswatch, above, are good on this stuff)
reports from groups like the World Rainforest Movement, pointing to alleged
human rights abuses - eg. at an offset project in Mount Elgon, east Uganda,
where villagers were apparently kicked off land so trees could be planted.
One more warning note on the
horizon came recently in a report from Labour-backing think-tank The Institute for Public Policy Research
(IPPR). According to their calculations, the aviation sector could make a
profit of up to 4bn Euros if carbon credits are given out free and generous
emission allowances allocated, as was the case when power companies agreed to be
included in the European Union Emissions
Trading Scheme (the latter made a £1bn windfall). Aviation is likely to
pass on the full costs of these credits, of course, so any emissions credits
given away would just be massive profit for the airlines – somewhere between € 1.34
billion and €4 billion (£0.9 billion - £2.7 billion), depending on the price
level of carbon credits themselves. "The EU should take a strong lead on
curbing emissions from airline flights and clip the aviation industry's
wings." said Simon Retallack of the IPPR. Remember that.
Oh, the dog? No, nothing to
do with trees, just the punchline of the best description of Carbon Offset I’ve
come across (sorry if you’ve heard it before): “it’s like paying the RSPCA so
you can go on kicking your dog.”


